On Tuesday, March 10 at 1:00 pm, I shared a post in this mrontemp blog entitled Of spans and series, or why I haven't written in mrontemp that much.
On Saturday, March 14 at 11:25 pm, I shared a post in my Empoprise-BI blog entitled Empoprise-BI temporarily focuses on self-referentialism. Toward the end of the post, I wrote:
...a lot of it boils down to the fact that my primary interface with the online world is under the "Ontario Emperor" name.
Well, until Saturday afternoon. I made one of those snap decisions and decided to change the precedence of the two personas, and formally make Empoprises (and thus John Bredehoft) my primary persona.
I'm not quite sure what this means yet. It probably means that some of the stuff that "Ontario Emperor" would do will now be done by Empoprises. It could mean a sharp decrease in "Ontario Emperor" activity. And it may also mean that I will spend less time looking at things like technology (unless there is a business focus), politics, and religion.
I've already done some shifting, moving many of my Google Reader subscriptions to my Empoprises Google Reader account, making "John Bredehoft" an administrator on the FriendFeed lastfmfeeds room, and making some other changes that will become more apparent in the coming days.
In essence, while I suspect that things will still pop up here and in my related "Ontario Emperor" properties from time to time, my interests have focused elsewhere.
If you want to follow what I'm doing, check out http://friendfeed.com/empoprises and http://twitter.com/empoprises.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Not the last mrontemp post, but you may want to check out the Empoprises FriendFeed and Twitter accounts
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
1:00 PM
View Comments
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Of spans and series, or why I haven't written in mrontemp that much
It is now March 10, 2009, and this is only the seventh post that I've written at mrontemp this month.
Compare this with January 2009, during which I wrote 59 posts in this blog, or almost two posts per day.
Or how about January 2008, when I wrote 202 posts?
One could reach the conclusion that I've quit writing in the long form and have instead reverted to just shooting the breeze on FriendFeed.
But actually, that's only part of the equation. I've been blogging up a storm - just not here.
I've talked about my Empoprises project before on this blog. For those who aren't aware, I author a series of four blogs under the "Empoprises" banner. Unlike the "all-encompassing" blog mrontemp, the Empoprises blogs are each devoted to a specific topic.
Far from restricting me creatively, the existence of four separate blogs has actually given me more freedom.
For example, I will often make a game of taking the same event and spanning it across as many Empoprises blogs as possible. Take my weekend visit to the Wal Mart in Chino, California - a business in the Inland Empire that sells music. Yeah, I milked that one.
But I'm having just as much fun writing various series of posts in the blogs. My longest-running series, Empoprise-NTN High Noon, takes a look at various restaurants and bars that offer NTN Buzztime trivia. And I'm getting close to wrapping up a series entitled When Madonna Was Hot. And I just wrapped up A Piece of the P.I.E. (Professionals of the Inland Empire).
But sometimes, rather than planning a series, I just fall into one. For example, on Monday I wrote a post entitled Payola, pay per post, or the 1984 commercial? An inconsistency of moral outrage re product placement business practices. Today, I followed it up with Or perhaps I am outrageous - an opposing view on disclosure and pay per post. Although this doesn't have a cutesy title, I hope to pursue the topic in the future.
If I hold up.
You see, I've been able to keep these blogs running by writing scheduled posts at odd hours (for example, unless I change the schedule, I've already written a Thursday post for Empoprise-BI, "Words aren't only cool, they make you money"). But time is finite, as Steven Hodson noted in a post entitled "Think long and hard before starting that second or third blog." An excerpt:
The problem is that time and energy are never kind to us – especially if our work on our main blog is our primary concern. This isn’t an uncommon occurrence as the web is littered with blogs that have been long forgotten for one reason or another. We only have so much time and/or energy and no matter our first rush of getting that new blog up and running at some point we run out of steam.
So perhaps this may falter along the way, and Empoprises may give me nightmares in the future. But at the moment I'm having fun.
P.S. Steven Hodson wrote his cautionary post on March 2. I've wanted to write a formal response to it, but it's taken me eight days to do it. Although this post is a non-scheduled post, one problem with writing scheduled posts is that they often aren't all that timely. But what does that matter to me? I am not trendy.
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
1:00 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, geography, music, technology
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter - What does it don't?
One of my FriendFeed buddies, Chris White, has been busy this evening.
I was sharing some things in Google Reader a little earlier, and White has responded to a couple of them.
For example, I shared something that postulated that Facebook's just-announced changes are an attempt to counter Twitter. White commented via FriendFeed:
What is Facebook, what is Twitter?
A few minutes later, I shared Dana Franks' post "Why Twitter Matters to Me." White commented on the FriendFeed share for this item also:
What is Twitter?
I figured that White was executing a master plan - and frankly, I think that master plans are stupid things unless I'm the one executing them. And, with apologies to Jim Bakker, I was right:
I am going to respond to every Facebook and Twitter post with the question "What does it do?" I'm sure you will be annoyed, and then you will know how I feel.
I might use some variation, such as "What is it?"
Actually, White is asking a valid question, especially since Facebook and Twitter tend to get a lot of press. But you can ask yourself, do the applications do anything?
In an attempt to answer that question, I'd like to invite you to dinner with me. The dozen or so diners who gathered at the restaurant earlier this evening came from different backgrounds - some were scientists, others were forensic people, and others were salespeople or marketers. But all of us were interested in technology. Which meant that several of us brought out our phones at some point in the evening.
Now, as Louis Gray happens to know, my current phone is a 2 1/2 year old Motorola Q (or, as Gray lovingly calls it, an "8-bit rotary phone") with the equivalent of Internet Explorer 4. But Gray will be happy to know that I associate with people that have more modern phones, such as the Apple iPhone that Gray likes. Perhaps you've heard of this phone. And perhaps you've heard of some of the applications that you can get for the iPhone.
- You can get an application that allows the iPhone to act like an ocarina.
- You can get an application that makes irritating noises, like the sound of a dentist's drill.
- You can get an application that imitates a glass of beer - you hold the iPhone upright to pour the beer into the "cup," then you tilt the iPhone to "drink" the beer.
Now when you hear about these applications, you're forced to ask a probing question about the iPhone:
The answer, whether you're talking about the iPhone, Twitter, Facebook, or a hammer, is that the item in question does whatever you want it to do.
Let me share something more serious from that same dinner. My day job is as a product manager, and part of my responsibility is to set overall direction for my product. As part of my job, and because of my fifteen years in my particular industry, I sometimes pretend like I know what the product should do.
But I've learned something over the years. As soon as I use my imagined knowledge to make a statement such as "This product will never need feature X," I will receive a request from a customer asking for...you guessed it; feature X.
You see, I don't determine how my product will be used. Steve Jobs doesn't determine how the iPhone will be used. And the Facebook and Twitter people don't determine how their products will be used. (Although Jobs and Zuckerberg try to dictate uses.) In the end, it's the users that determine how these products will be used. I say it again, it's the users that determine how these products will be used.
Just like Google doesn't determine how Blogger will be used. This post was originally entitled "What does it don't?" But then I changed the title to "Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter - What does it don't?" knowing full well that the title of the post would eventually end up on FriendFeed...and that Chris White would see it...
Told you that my master plans were brilliant. Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
8:30 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, technology
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Using the winter coat, part 2
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
7:32 PM
View Comments
Using the winter coat, part 1
As I've mentioned in some other forums, I had to take a business trip to Maryland today (Tuesday). Luckily I didn't have to fly on Monday, because it was still snowing in the area at the time. (I was monitoring the @insidecharmcity Twitter account very carefully on Monday.)
After a four-hour layover in Denver (I like to not be rushed), I landed at BWI early this evening East Coast time. The roads are clear, and I made it to my hotel.
See the next post for something I found at the hotel.
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
7:25 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, geography, technology
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Yes, hell has frozen over...I've joined Facebook

(This picture is from Flickr user billums and is used under this license)
Back on October 9, 2007 I blogged the following:
So I'm thinking that I may have to set up a Facebook account at some point if I want to be only slightly non-trendy. I know I'm supposed to be the "I am not trendy" guy, but my MySpace account is so non-trendy that it's like leeches.
Of course, trendiness is not the sole reason to join Facebook. It's potentially an excellent way to contact people you know.
But, over the years, I've been reluctant to join Facebook for a couple of reasons:
- Their view on pseudononymous accounts. Basically, they prefer that you use your given name on Facebook, even if you market yourself under another identity. Until recently most of my online interactions were under the Ontario Emperor name, and I didn't want to jettison my brand just because Facebook wanted me to do so. If you really want to explore my thoughts on this in detail, check out my link-heavy song parody that I wrote on January 9, 2008.
- The horror stories about Facebook policies. There are numerous examples of these, the whole thingie about the terms of service being the latest example.
Last night I spent some time on LinkedIn, and ended up sending connection requests to two people that I knew from high school. This in itself was unusual, because I have only maintained regular contact with one person from my high school. Not because I hated the school or anything like that, but because I left town in 1979 and have rarely been back since, so I've naturally lost touch with a lot of folks. So anyways, I sent the two connection requests, and got the following response from the second person when my request was accepted:
John, get on facebook
Well, when that person talks, I listen. (I'd tell you the name of the person who sent this message, but if I did that, I'd be violating that person's privacy, wouldn't I?)
So I signed up for Facebook and was immediately befriended by Jan McInnis, as well as by a former co-worker who is very social media-savvy. I've sent out a few more friend requests and gotten two responses, but have not yet heard from the classmate who urged me to join Facebook in the first place.
So how will I use Facebook? I've read the suggestions in this FriendFeed thread that I started, and my initial thought is that I will use it in conjunction with my LinkedIn and Plaxo accounts (and, to a limited extent, with my MySpace account). I won't be following over a thousand people like I do in Twitter or FriendFeed, but the Facebook account may not just consist of people that I've physically met either.
In essence, I've provided the answer to my own question:
Has Facebook become one of the services that you must join, whether you like it or not?
Perhaps. Theoretically you could use one service to do everything that you want to do, but there are going to be people who are on Facebook and not on LinkedIn, or vice versa. (This is one of the reasons that I maintain my MySpace account; certain people are only reachable there.)
The only disturbing part of this is that the number of "must-use" services could potentially mushroom out of control. Think about it; in addition to various Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo properties, I have a presence on a ton of services, including:
Allmusic
Am570radio
Amazon
Chumby
del.icio.us
Disqus
Excite
Frappr
FriendFeed
Getsatisfaction
Gospelr
InfoWorld
Inside the IE
Jaiku
last.fm
Mojipage
Monster
Mychurch
Myheritage
MySpace
Ning
Pandora
PBwiki
Perplexmi
Scrine
Soup.io
Stumbleupon
Technorati
Tripod
Twit2Fit
Velvet Rope
Wetpaint
Wikipedia
Yelp
And that's probably just one third of the services to which I have memberships. There are some memberships that I have for corporate reasons, and there are some memberships that I just plain am not going to talk about (for a variety of reasons).
Frankly, some of the services listed above haven't been visited by me in months, if not years. Some I use every day. But what happens if a situation arises where I have to use five of these services every day? Ten? Twenty?
But I'm not concerned about that now. The immediate concern in my mind is this - what the heck is a poke, and what is the etiquette to follow if I get one? Belgrade and Beyond has expressed some thoughts:
How many times you have been poked by a friend, colleague, and affiliate? And what was your reaction? I had to write few lines on this as I am recently (massively) poked on Facebook. It was regular, surprisingly massively poking (not superpoking), not explicitly poked, but – just regular poke with two choices given: to poke back or remove poke....
In social networking terms, poke is contextual, and the context of poke is dependent upon the current level of familiarity between the ‘poker’ and the ‘pokee’. I remember last year I was invited to a group “Enough with poking, let’s just have sex “, and ignored request for the membership as I observed then poking as friendly virtual gesture with friends and colleagues , usually denoting verbal phrase: “Hey , what’s up?” , or “Look at me!”, saying” ”Hi”, to someone you already know well or screaming background form: “Hey, I’m here, online!,” or “Hey, I’m busy but just poked you to say I didn’t forget this and that or will be back soon’, followed usually by message/email. And there are pokes that are expressing more than friendly, primarily school behavior with connotation: “I poke you and now you have to poke me back”.
Poking for fun? “I won’t pull your hair/ponytail – but I’m poking you” - elements of (naïve) and light weighted flirtation. Therefore, poke can be flirting. Poke can be “I am shy but won’t to say hi”.
There are numerous possible meanings and interpretations behind the poke....
Oh boy. Learning a new culture and its terminology is complex.
#TINOSP. Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
12:15 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, technology
Sunday, February 22, 2009
On Saturday's FriendFeed meetup, and on meetups in general
Some people may think it odd that communicating via computers can lead to increased non-computer communications, but I've known that for decades.
I've previously blogged about some of my BBS experiences in the early 1990s (see this list of BBS systems I frequented), but some of the most fun from that time would be when the people from The Grotto and other WWIV boards would gather at places such as Benjie's (long gone), drink cold brown thingies, and shoot the breeze about Ralph the iguana and other topics that were the BBS generation's equivalent of bacon/mango conversations.
After that, most of my online communications remained strictly online until I began going to Oracle OpenWorld and blogging about it. When I first went to Oracle OpenWorld I'd only stay for a day or two, so it's wasn't until 2007 that I got to personally meet the other Oracle bloggers at the Thirsty Bear. I've joined them again in 2008 and, depending upon what transpires in my future, I hope to join them again at Oracle OpenWorld 2009.
So over a week ago, Anika Malone began planning a FriendFeed meetup for FriendFeed users in the Los Angeles area, at the Five Guys in Cerritos, California. While part of the attraction was the chance to sample a Five Guys burger (my parents had told me about them), obviously another part was the opportunity to meet Anika and other FriendFeeders, none of whom I had met before (other than the Oracle people, of course).
So my wife (who is not on FriendFeed or Twitter, but who did get active in the Grotto and some other BBS systems back in the day) and I drove down to Cerritos, a little later than usual (tips: make sure you leave on time, and that your just-repaired car seat actually works, and that you have money for food). After I got my lunch, I got a chance to visit with some other FriendFeeders: not only Anika (faboomama), but also adrianculici, krynsky, geekandahalf (Derrick), elzbeth (Pea), and faithx5 (Jandy).
While my wife and I skipped out on post-burger geek store goodies, we had a fun time.
Incidentally, I've written three additional posts which are at least tangentially related to the FriendFeed meetup:
- Buffalo in Hovercraft, or Why I Don't Direct Videos (Empoprise-MU)
- Five Guys Burgers and Fries (Empoprise-BI)
- Van Hagar and the stringless phenomenon (Empoprise-MU)
But this isn't the last meetup that I'll be attending; the LinkedIn group Professionals of the Inland Empire will be getting together on Tuesday, and I hope to stop by there for a little bit (although I have another commitment later that evening). Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
5:50 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, technology
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Friday, February 20, 2009
The Lausanne Covenant, business, and religion
I noticed that one of my LinkedIn contacts had joined a LinkedIn group called "Christian Professionals." The group includes a statement, part of which reads as follows:
The Christian Professionals Group exists to be:
- a welcome place where God's Kids, at all levels of maturity, and from all walks of life can encourage and be encouraged to grow in relationship with Jesus and each other.
- a growing place where Christian principles are taught, caught and internalized, leading to application in interpersonal relationships in the home, the business world and all of life.
- a disciplined place - where respect for God and each other is accepted and exemplified.
It then goes on to say:
The statement of Beliefs we agree to can be found at: http://www.lausanne.org/lausanne-1974/lausanne-covenant.html
Having not previously been familiar with this covenant, I went ahead and read it.
The Lausanne Covenant
INTRODUCTION
We, members of the Church of Jesus Christ, from more than 150 nations, participants in the International Congress on World Evangelization at Lausanne, praise God for his great salvation and rejoice in the fellowship he has given us with himself and with each other. We are deeply stirred by what God is doing in our day, moved to penitence by our failures and challenged by the unfinished task of evangelization. We believe the Gospel is God's good news for the whole world, and we are determined by his grace to obey Christ's commission to proclaim it to all mankind and to make disciples of every nation. We desire, therefore, to affirm our faith and our resolve, and to make public our covenant.
1. THE PURPOSE OF GOD
We affirm our belief in the one-eternal God, Creator and Lord of the world, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, who governs all things according to the purpose of his will. He has been calling out from the world a people for himself, and sending his people back into the world to be his servants and his witnesses, for the extension of his kingdom, the building up of Christ's body, and the glory of his name. We confess with shame that we have often denied our calling and failed in our mission, by becoming conformed to the world or by withdrawing from it. Yet we rejoice that even when borne by earthen vessels the gospel is still a precious treasure. To the task of making that treasure known in the power of the Holy Spirit we desire to dedicate ourselves anew.
(Isa. 40:28; Matt. 28:19; Eph. 1:11; Acts 15:14; John 17:6, 18; Eph 4:12; 1 Cor. 5:10; Rom. 12:2; II Cor. 4:7)
2. THE AUTHORITY AND POWER OF THE BIBLE
We affirm the divine inspiration, truthfulness and authority of both Old and New Testament Scriptures in their entirety as the only written word of God, without error in all that it affirms, and the only infallible rule of faith and practice. We also affirm the power of God's word to accomplish his purpose of salvation. The message of the Bible is addressed to all men and women. For God's revelation in Christ and in Scripture is unchangeable. Through it the Holy Spirit still speaks today. He illumines the minds of God's people in every culture to perceive its truth freshly through their own eyes and thus discloses to the whole Church ever more of the many-colored wisdom of God.
(II Tim. 3:16; II Pet. 1:21; John 10:35; Isa. 55:11; 1 Cor. 1:21; Rom. 1:16, Matt. 5:17,18; Jude 3; Eph. 1:17,18; 3:10,18)
3. THE UNIQUENESS AND UNIVERSALITY OF CHRIST
We affirm that there is only one Saviour and only one gospel, although there is a wide diversity of evangelistic approaches. We recognise that everyone has some knowledge of God through his general revelation in nature. But we deny that this can save, for people suppress the truth by their unrighteousness. We also reject as derogatory to Christ and the gospel every kind of syncretism and dialogue which implies that Christ speaks equally through all religions and ideologies. Jesus Christ, being himself the only God-man, who gave himself as the only ransom for sinners, is the only mediator between God and people. There is no other name by which we must be saved. All men and women are perishing because of sin, but God loves everyone, not wishing that any should perish but that all should repent. Yet those who reject Christ repudiate the joy of salvation and condemn themselves to eternal separation from God. To proclaim Jesus as "the Saviour of the world" is not to affirm that all people are either automatically or ultimately saved, still less to affirm that all religions offer salvation in Christ. Rather it is to proclaim God's love for a world of sinners and to invite everyone to respond to him as Saviour and Lord in the wholehearted personal commitment of repentance and faith. Jesus Christ has been exalted above every other name; we long for the day when every knee shall bow to him and every tongue shall confess him Lord.
(Gal. 1:6-9;Rom. 1:18-32; I Tim. 2:5,6; Acts 4:12; John 3:16-19; II Pet. 3:9; II Thess. 1:7-9;John 4:42; Matt. 11:28; Eph. 1:20,21; Phil. 2:9-11)
4. THE NATURE OF EVANGELISM
To evangelize is to spread the good news that Jesus Christ died for our sins and was raised from the dead according to the Scriptures, and that as the reigning Lord he now offers the forgiveness of sins and the liberating gifts of the Spirit to all who repent and believe. Our Christian presence in the world is indispensable to evangelism, and so is that kind of dialogue whose purpose is to listen sensitively in order to understand. But evangelism itself is the proclamation of the historical, biblical Christ as Saviour and Lord, with a view to persuading people to come to him personally and so be reconciled to God. In issuing the gospel invitation we have no liberty to conceal the cost of discipleship. Jesus still calls all who would follow him to deny themselves, take up their cross, and identify themselves with his new community. The results of evangelism include obedience to Christ, incorporation into his Church and responsible service in the world.
(I Cor. 15:3,4; Acts 2: 32-39; John 20:21; I Cor. 1:23; II Cor. 4:5; 5:11,20; Luke 14:25-33; Mark 8:34; Acts 2:40,47; Mark 10:43-45)
5. CHRISTIAN SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
We affirm that God is both the Creator and the Judge of all men. We therefore should share his concern for justice and reconciliation throughout human society and for the liberation of men and women from every kind of oppression. Because men and women are made in the image of God, every person, regardless of race, religion, colour, culture, class, sex or age, has an intrinsic dignity because of which he or she should be respected and served, not exploited. Here too we express penitence both for our neglect and for having sometimes regarded evangelism and social concern as mutually exclusive. Although reconciliation with other people is not reconciliation with God, nor is social action evangelism, nor is political liberation salvation, nevertheless we affirm that evangelism and socio-political involvement are both part of our Christian duty. For both are necessary expressions of our doctrines of God and man, our love for our neighbour and our obedience to Jesus Christ. The message of salvation implies also a message of judgment upon every form of alienation, oppression and discrimination, and we should not be afraid to denounce evil and injustice wherever they exist. When people receive Christ they are born again into his kingdom and must seek not only to exhibit but also to spread its righteousness in the midst of an unrighteous world. The salvation we claim should be transforming us in the totality of our personal and social responsibilities. Faith without works is dead.
(Acts 17:26,31; Gen. 18:25; Isa. 1:17; Psa. 45:7; Gen. 1:26,27; Jas. 3:9; Lev. 19:18; Luke 6:27,35; Jas. 2:14-26; Joh. 3:3,5; Matt. 5:20; 6:33; II Cor. 3:18; Jas. 2:20)
6. THE CHURCH AND EVANGELISM
We affirm that Christ sends his redeemed people into the world as the Father sent him, and that this calls for a similar deep and costly penetration of the world. We need to break out of our ecclesiastical ghettos and permeate non-Christian society. In the Church's mission of sacrificial service evangelism is primary. World evangelization requires the whole Church to take the whole gospel to the whole world. The Church is at the very centre of God's cosmic purpose and is his appointed means of spreading the gospel. But a church which preaches the cross must itself be marked by the cross. It becomes a stumbling block to evangelism when it betrays the gospel or lacks a living faith in God, a genuine love for people, or scrupulous honesty in all things including promotion and finance. The church is the community of God's people rather than an institution, and must not be identified with any particular culture, social or political system, or human ideology.
(John 17:18; 20:21; Matt. 28:19,20; Acts 1:8; 20:27; Eph. 1:9,10; 3:9-11; Gal. 6:14,17; II Cor. 6:3,4; II Tim. 2:19-21; Phil. 1:27)
7. COOPERATION IN EVANGELISM
We affirm that the Church's visible unity in truth is God's purpose. Evangelism also summons us to unity, because our oneness strengthens our witness, just as our disunity undermines our gospel of reconciliation. We recognize, however, that organisational unity may take many forms and does not necessarily forward evangelism. Yet we who share the same biblical faith should be closely united in fellowship, work and witness. We confess that our testimony has sometimes been marred by a sinful individualism and needless duplication. We pledge ourselves to seek a deeper unity in truth, worship, holiness and mission. We urge the development of regional and functional cooperation for the furtherance of the Church's mission, for strategic planning, for mutual encouragement, and for the sharing of resources and experience.
(John 17:21,23; Eph. 4:3,4; John 13:35; Phil. 1:27; John 17:11-23)
8. CHURCHES IN EVANGELISTIC PARTNERSHIP
We rejoice that a new missionary era has dawned. The dominant role of western missions is fast disappearing. God is raising up from the younger churches a great new resource for world evangelization, and is thus demonstrating that the responsibility to evangelise belongs to the whole body of Christ. All churches should therefore be asking God and themselves what they should be doing both to reach their own area and to send missionaries to other parts of the world. A reevaluation of our missionary responsibility and role should be continuous. Thus a growing partnership of churches will develop and the universal character of Christ's Church will be more clearly exhibited. We also thank God for agencies which labor in Bible translation, theological education, the mass media, Christian literature, evangelism, missions, church renewal and other specialist fields. They too should engage in constant self-examination to evaluate their effectiveness as part of the Church's mission.
(Rom. 1:8; Phil. 1:5; 4:15; Acts 13:1-3, I Thess. 1:6-8)
9. THE URGENCY OF THE EVANGELISTIC TASK
More than 2,700 million people, which is more than two-thirds of all humanity, have yet to be evangelised. We are ashamed that so many have been neglected; it is a standing rebuke to us and to the whole Church. There is now, however, in many parts of the world an unprecedented receptivity to the Lord Jesus Christ. We are convinced that this is the time for churches and para-church agencies to pray earnestly for the salvation of the unreached and to launch new efforts to achieve world evangelization. A reduction of foreign missionaries and money in an evangelised country may sometimes be necessary to facilitate the national church's growth in self-reliance and to release resources for unevangelised areas. Missionaries should flow ever more freely from and to all six continents in a spirit of humble service. The goal should be, by all available means and at the earliest possible time, that every person will have the opportunity to hear, understand, and to receive the good news. We cannot hope to attain this goal without sacrifice. All of us are shocked by the poverty of millions and disturbed by the injustices which cause it. Those of us who live in affluent circumstances accept our duty to develop a simple life-style in order to contribute more generously to both relief and evangelism.
(John 9:4; Matt. 9:35-38; Rom. 9:1-3; I Cor. 9:19-23; Mark 16:15; Isa. 58:6,7; Jas. 1:27; 2:1-9; Matt. 25:31-46; Acts 2:44,45; 4:34,35)
10. EVANGELISM AND CULTURE
The development of strategies for world evangelization calls for imaginative pioneering methods. Under God, the result will be the rise of churches deeply rooted in Christ and closely related to their culture. Culture must always be tested and judged by Scripture. Because men and women are God's creatures, some of their culture is rich in beauty and goodness. Because they are fallen, all of it is tainted with sin and some of it is demonic. The gospel does not presuppose the superiority of any culture to another, but evaluates all cultures according to its own criteria of truth and righteousness, and insists on moral absolutes in every culture. Missions have all too frequently exported with the gospel an alien culture and churches have sometimes been in bondage to culture rather than to Scripture. Christ's evangelists must humbly seek to empty themselves of all but their personal authenticity in order to become the servants of others, and churches must seek to transform and enrich culture, all for the glory of God.
(Mark 7:8,9,13; Gen. 4:21,22; I Cor. 9:19-23; Phil. 2:5-7; II Cor. 4:5)
11. EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP
We confess that we have sometimes pursued church growth at the expense of church depth, and divorced evangelism from Christian nurture. We also acknowledge that some of our missions have been too slow to equip and encourage national leaders to assume their rightful responsibilities. Yet we are committed to indigenous principles, and long that every church will have national leaders who manifest a Christian style of leadership in terms not of domination but of service. We recognise that there is a great need to improve theological education, especially for church leaders. In every nation and culture there should be an effective training programme for pastors and laity in doctrine, discipleship, evangelism, nurture and service. Such training programmes should not rely on any stereotyped methodology but should be developed by creative local initiatives according to biblical standards.
(Col. I:27,28; Acts 14:23; Tit. 1:5,9; Mark 10:42-45; Eph. 4:11,12)
12. SPIRITUAL CONFLICT
We believe that we are engaged in constant spiritual warfare with the principalities and powers of evil, who are seeking to overthrow the Church and frustrate its task of world evangelization. We know our need to equip ourselves with God's armour and to fight this battle with the spiritual weapons of truth and prayer. For we detect the activity of our enemy, not only in false ideologies outside the Church, but also inside it in false gospels which twist Scripture and put people in the place of God. We need both watchfulness and discernment to safeguard the biblical gospel. We acknowledge that we ourselves are not immune to worldliness of thoughts and action, that is, to a surrender to secularism. For example, although careful studies of church growth, both numerical and spiritual, are right and valuable, we have sometimes neglected them. At other times, desirous to ensure a response to the gospel, we have compromised our message, manipulated our hearers through pressure techniques, and become unduly preoccupied with statistics or even dishonest in our use of them. All this is worldly. The Church must be in the world; the world must not be in the Church.
(Eph. 6:12; II Cor. 4:3,4; Eph. 6:11,13-18; II Cor. 10:3-5; I John 2:18-26; 4:1-3; Gal. 1:6-9; II Cor. 2:17; 4:2; John 17:15)
13. FREEDOM AND PERSECUTION
It is the God-appointed duty of every government to secure conditions of peace, justice and liberty in which the Church may obey God, serve the Lord Jesus Christ, and preach the gospel without interference. We therefore pray for the leaders of nations and call upon them to guarantee freedom of thought and conscience, and freedom to practise and propagate religion in accordance with the will of God and as set forth in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We also express our deep concern for all who have been unjustly imprisoned, and especially for those who are suffering for their testimony to the Lord Jesus. We promise to pray and work for their freedom. At the same time we refuse to be intimidated by their fate. God helping us, we too will seek to stand against injustice and to remain faithful to the gospel, whatever the cost. We do not forget the warnings of Jesus that persecution is inevitable.
(I Tim. 1:1-4, Acts 4:19; 5:29; Col. 3:24; Heb. 13:1-3; Luke 4:18; Gal. 5:11; 6:12; Matt. 5:10-12; John 15:18-21)
14. THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
We believe in the power of the Holy Spirit. The Father sent his Spirit to bear witness to his Son; without his witness ours is futile. Conviction of sin, faith in Christ, new birth and Christian growth are all his work. Further, the Holy Spirit is a missionary spirit; thus evangelism should arise spontaneously from a Spirit-filled church. A church that is not a missionary church is contradicting itself and quenching the Spirit. Worldwide evangelization will become a realistic possibility only when the Spirit renews the Church in truth and wisdom, faith, holiness, love and power. We therefore call upon all Christians to pray for such a visitation of the sovereign Spirit of God that all his fruit may appear in all his people and that all his gifts may enrich the body of Christ. Only then will the whole church become a fit instrument in his hands, that the whole earth may hear his voice.
(I Cor. 2:4; John 15:26;27; 16:8-11; I Cor. 12:3; John 3:6-8; II Cor. 3:18; John 7:37-39; I Thess. 5:19; Acts 1:8; Psa. 85:4-7; 67:1-3; Gal. 5:22,23; I Cor. 12:4-31; Rom. 12:3-8)
15. THE RETURN OF CHRIST
We believe that Jesus Christ will return personally and visibly, in power and glory, to consummate his salvation and his judgment. This promise of his coming is a further spur to our evangelism, for we remember his words that the gospel must first be preached to all nations. We believe that the interim period between Christ's ascension and return is to be filled with the mission of the people of God, who have no liberty to stop before the end. We also remember his warning that false Christs and false prophets will arise as precursors of the final Antichrist. We therefore reject as a proud, self-confident dream the notion that people can ever build a utopia on earth. Our Christian confidence is that God will perfect his kingdom, and we look forward with eager anticipation to that day, and to the new heaven and earth in which righteousness will dwell and God will reign forever. Meanwhile, we rededicate ourselves to the service of Christ and of people in joyful submission to his authority over the whole of our lives.
(Mark 14:62; Heb. 9:28; Mark 13:10; Acts 1:8-11; Matt. 28:20; Mark 13:21-23; John 2:18; 4:1-3; Luke 12:32; Rev. 21:1-5; II Pet. 3:13; Matt. 28:18)
CONCLUSION
Therefore, in the light of this our faith and our resolve, we enter into a solemn covenant with God and with each other, to pray, to plan and to work together for the evangelization of the whole world. We call upon others to join us. May God help us by his grace and for his glory to be faithful to this our covenant! Amen, Alleluia!
Cephas Library has published a very long denunciation of ecumenicism in general and the Lausanne Covenant in particular. And Evangelical Ministries to New Religions (EMNR) noted that there are different versions of the Lausanne Covenant (they prefer the 1974 version). The Lutheran Church Missouri Synod is apparently silent on the Lausanne Covenant, but International Cooperating Ministries supports it, as does the Lausanne Committee on Jewish Evangelism.
Oh, what a tangled web we weave. And this post just touches the surface.
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
7:00 AM
View Comments
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Deep Springs revisited...or not (I never went there)
Last night I was at a college night, during which various college/university representatives spoke about their institutions.
One of the speakers was Peter Osgood, Director of Admission at Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, California. Osgood was not merely there to represent Harvey Mudd; he was charged to represent ALL private colleges and universities. (Other speakers spoke about the UC system, the Cal State system, community colleges, and the like.)
While Osgood noted that the median size of a private school is smaller than the median size of a public school, there is still great diversity in private schools. He cited the University of Southern California as an example of a very large private school, and then asked if anyone knew what the smallest private college in California was.
Out of the crowd of a couple of hundred people, yours truly ventured to guess, "Deep Springs College?"
And yours truly is now the proud owner of a Harvey Mudd banner for getting the answer right.
I didn't get a chance to talk to Osgood afterwards, so I couldn't tell him how I came across this bit of trivia. (Hmm...another case in which a post could have gone into another of my blogs. But I don't see this as an NTN Buzztime question.)
So anyways, back in the dark ages of the 1970s, when Robert Plant was all the rage and the Pittsburgh Steelers dominated football - wait a minute, THE FIRST TIME when Robert Plant was - let me start again.
So anyways, back in the dark ages of the 1970s, when there were only three commercial television networks, I was back in Virginia, getting a lot of mail from colleges and universities. I forget whether I got this in the mail or read about it somewhere, but one of the colleges that I heard of was Deep Springs. My impression at the time was that the college was an interesting place, to say the least. Located in one state with an address in another state, the students (all male, I believe) read the classics for two years, when they weren't working on the ranch at which the college was located. I decided that was a little too far out for me, so I went to Reed College instead, where I read the classics for four years and worked on the Reed College Quest. (Any educator who reads this post is probably smirking right now.)
Well, Deep Springs is still around today. Still two-year, still all-male. But, unlike the 1970s, you can read about the college on its website:
Deep Springs is an all-male liberal arts college located on a cattle-ranch and alfalfa farm in California's High Desert. Electrical pioneer L.L. Nunn founded the school in 1917 on the three pillars of academics, labor, and self-governance in order to help young men prepare themselves for lives of service to humanity. The school's 26 students, along with its staff and faculty, form a close community engaged in this intense project.
Deep Springs operates on the belief that manual labor and political deliberation are integral parts of a comprehensive liberal arts education.
Each student attends for two years and receives a full scholarship valued at over $50,000 per year. Afterwards, most complete their degrees at the world's most prestigious four year institutions.
View Larger Map
But not everyone has the most positive experience at Deep Springs:
n 1975-76, I attended Deep Springs College, arguably the strangest college in the world. It was an interesting place; the academics were actually much tougher and more challenging than anything I had to do in graduate school....
I hated my time at Deep Springs, actually. The year I was there I was the only vegetarian, and the cooks were hostile, cooking even corn in pork fat. As a result, I ended up with some serious nutrition-related medical problems and a bad attitude, and I ended up leaving early. Nonetheless, you can't go to Deep Springs without having it shape you in some significant way.
I could say more about very small schools...but I won't.
But small private schools, as well as large private schools, have similar challenges in some ways. Osgood noted one obvious difference between private and public schools: namely, that private schools are much more dependent upon non-government sources of funding. And fund-raising issues hit Deep Springs also, as this January 2008 article shows:
Louis Fantasia — an acclaimed Shakespeare scholar and theatrical director — has been ousted as president of Deep Springs College after only six months in the position.
Fantasia’s sudden departure, announced with little detail on New Year’s Day, stunned many alumni and others who have since learned of it. Fantasia would not comment, and board members released only a vague statement indicating a “divergence of visions” for the college by Fantasia and the board.
Sources familiar with the conflict at Deep Springs say that the difference of opinion had to do in part with fund raising....
According to those who are sympathetic to what the board did, Fantasia did not understand the unique nature of Deep Springs governance (although he had taught there several times) or of the role of its president, and was too focused on fund raising....
Critics of Fantasia said that his interest in fund raising risked setting up a situation where donors’ views might take precedence over those of students, potentially endangering the self-governance of which alumni are so proud.
Supporters of Fantasia talk about similar issues, but with a different take. They argue that he has correctly identified a need to significantly increase the college’s endowment (currently about $15 million) and to make the institution more visible. By keeping fund raising ambitions more modest, these supporters say, the current board leaders are placing a higher priority on preserving the status quo than on improving the college.
The whole thing is odd when you consider the state of education today. I could be wrong, but it's possible that Deep Springs is the only private educational institution in which the board has criticized the president for doing TOO MUCH fund-raising.
Pass the alfalfa sprouts - the branded alfalfa sprouts, please.
Hmm...maybe this belonged in my business blog...
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
8:00 AM
View Comments
Christian Behavioral Medicine Practitioner?
I was checking my email to see who was disturbed enough to follow me on Twitter, and I found that I am now being followed by @mdcounselor. So I followed @mdcounselor back.
It turns out that @mdcounselor is George Trimble, M.D. of Dallas, whose Twitter profile says he is a "Christian behavioral medicine practitioner."
I followed the link on his Twitter page...and ended up at an "under construction" notice. But Trimble wrote it in good humor:
Under Construction -- please drop back by. I know. I'll never see you again. C'est la vie, mon ami.
Trimble sounds depressed. He should see a Christian behavioral medicine practitioner.
Which reminds me - what IS a Christian behavioral medicine practitioner?
A Google search shows that Trimble is the only person who advertises himself in this way.
So, taking a step back, let's see what a behavioral medicine practitioner is. Here's what the state of Minnesota says:
Under administrative direction, provides technical consultation and direction to a broad spectrum of other clinicians, including medical specialists, psychologists, nurses, therapists and community health care providers in a specialized field of clinical psychology such as Adolescent Psychology, Behavioral Psychology, Neuro-Psychology or Forensics. Designs, develops, implements and evaluates psycho-social based treatment programs for clinically complex clients, including those with multiple diagnoses, conflicting diagnoses and unidentified disabilities. Testifies in court proceedings as an expert witness. Performs related work as required.
The Behavioral Medicine Practitioner provides specialized consultation to treatment teams in multiple programs serving a specific disability group (e.g. Mental Illness, Chemical Dependency, DD, etc.) at multiple facilities within a geographic region of service. It designs specialized treatment programs and directs the implementation of these strategies in multiple facilities within a region. It is also responsible for directing outcome analysis for programs within the specialty area, developing and delivering training in specialized assessment or treatment strategies for medical staff; directing and implementing quality improvement strategies and developing and monitoring utilization management.
The level of technical knowledge required for this position is typically acquired through additional specialized experience and educational training beyond that required for a Ph.D. in Psychology. Specialized certification is preferable.
You can probably tell that a human resources specialist (with appropriate degrees) wrote the text above. But the text below was written by an actual BMP - in Texas, no less. Dr. Greg Hupp:
Behavioral Medicine is the interdisciplinary field concerned with the
development and integration of behavioral, emotional, psychological, social, and medical knowledge and techniques relevant to the understanding of health and illness, and the application of this knowledge and these techniques to prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation.
So presumably my good Twitter buddy Trimble also integrates Christian belief into his practice. He's not the only one - Phil Monroe is a Christian psychologist who has a blog.
But he's not from Texas.
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
7:00 AM
View Comments
Labels: business, religion, technology
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins' no news is good news #DYSP
TechCrunch (yeah, the blog that TIME says is no longer relevant) posted this on February 17 regarding Twitter's ongoing search for someone to tell them how to make money:
At around 11 AM...the company sent out a rejection notice to many of the candidates who had applied for its open Product Manager position. But instead of using BCC to hide the identities of the applicants from each other, Twitter HR goofed and sent them all the message using a standard Carbon Copy, allowing everyone else to see who the other 185 applicants were.
But there's good news in this, as Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins noted:
What is interesting is the fact that I wasn’t on the recipient list for those rejected.
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
12:25 PM
View Comments
Labels: business
Pandora on the outs in copyright deal #DYSP
From Silicon Alley Insider:
The federal Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which sets royalty rates for recording artists and labels, and the National Association of Broadcasters have resolved a dispute that threatened to shutter thousands of Internet radio stations as well as Web music sites....
The CRB did not reach a deal with the Digital Media Association (DiMA), which represents Pandora, RealNetworks (RNWK) and MTV. Those negotiations failed to resolve before [the February 17] deadline.
We'll see if we have a bunch of Pandora alerts again.
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
12:15 PM
View Comments
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
In which I criticize Steven Hodson's home country for geotarding
Two of the bloggers that I read frequently are Steven Hodson and Duncan Riley. There are some similarities between the two.
- Neither Steven nor Duncan are American. Hodson is from Canada, Riley from Australia.
- Both work for The Inquisitr. Well, Riley has a slightly higher position at The Inquisitr than Hodson.
- Both hate geotarding.
In my capacity as an ugly American, I often forget about this. For example, there are often discussions about the pros and cons of last.fm vs. Pandora. To much of the world, the decision between the two services is a no-brainer, since Pandora isn't available outside of the United States. (Too bad for Caroline.)
So it was with great interest that I discovered that I, an American, am now the target of a geotarding effort. And I have Steven Hodson's home country to thank for this. NewTeeVee:
Canadians really know what they’re doing when it comes to showing people the Olympics online, it seems. This morning we spoke to Alon Marcovici, vice president of digital media from the country’s Olympic Broadcast Media Consortium, after reading that “every single moment” of next year’s Winter Olympics would be available live online.
NewTeeVee's Liz Gannes describes the comprehensive online coverage that's being offered - but then notes that there's a catch:
None of these feeds, however, will be available in the U.S. — they’ll be geo-blocked for viewers outside of Canada.
But before I call Joe Baca, Dianne Feinstein, and Barbara Boxer to demand that President Obama invade Canada, I should note that Liz Gannes then mentioned an American company that has an interest in seeing these events be geotarded:
NBC still owns the American rights to the Olympics, and from all appearances they think their on-demand approach to coverage à la Beijing — delaying airing key events until primetime broadcast — is the way to go.
Don't get me started on delaying broadcasts of live events. It makes me...um...cranky. Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
12:50 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, television
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Revisiting Charles Sophy's medical degree
Back on June 22, 2007, I wrote a post on Charles Sophy that noted, among other things, that Sophy is a D.O. and not an M.D. This was taken from a Radar Online post:
Sophy has been mistakenly referred to as an M.D. (specifically by Men's Health). He's a D.O., a doctor of osteopathy, a slightly different classification, though D.O. schooling and training mirrors that of M.D.s. Osteopaths focus on alternative treatments, prevention, and patients' total wellness rather than specific symptoms. And osteopathic psychiatrists make up about 10 percent of the American Psychiatric Association, of which Sophy has been a member for more than a decade.
My post just prompted the following comment:
Anonymous said...
You might want to do your research a little more responsibly and profesionally. Dr. Sophy is the Medical Director of Los Angeles County D.C.S.F. (Dept. of Children and Family Services) He is most certainly an M.D. I know; he was my son's psychiatrist at the L.A. County D.M.H. (Dept. of Mental Health) for two years.
Your ramblings are absolutely pathetic.
06 February, 2009 01:05
So, what does Interactive Dad Magazine say about Sophy's degree? Nothing. Here's the relevant portion:
His professional training includes medical residencies in family practice at Metropolitian Hospital (Philadelphia), and adult psychiatry at Norristown State Hospital, and a fellowship in child/adolescent psychiatry Hahneuman University Hospital ( Philadelphia), as well as, other massive government-run psychiatric institutions around Philadelphia.
And HealthGrades has a listing for Dr. Charles J. Sophy, MD, but with this interesting wrinkle:
Medical School, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Med
Now perhaps I should be...um...professional and specifically investigate how many MD degrees the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Med grants, but there are better ways to spend one's time.
But does it make any difference? Here's what [CORRECTED 2/19] the American Osteopathic Association says:
DO's and MD's are alike in many ways:
* Applicants to both DO. and M.D. colleges typically have a four-year undergraduate degree with an emphasis on science courses.
* Both DO's and MD's complete four years of basic medical education.
* After medical school, both DO's and MD's can choose to practice in a specialty area of medicine such as psychiatry, surgery, or obstetrics. They both complete a residency program, which takes typically two to six years of additional training.
* Both DO's and MD's must pass comparable state licensing examinations.
* DO's and MD's both practice in fully accredited and licensed hospitals and medical centers.
* DO's comprise a separate, yet equal branch of American medical care. Together DO's and MD's enhance the state of health care available in America.
* However, it's the ways that DO's and MD's are different that can bring an extra dimension to your family's health care.
DO's bring something extra to medicine:
* Osteopathic schools emphasize training students to be primary care physicians.
* DO's practice a "whole person" approach to medicine. Instead of just treating specific symptoms or illnesses, they regard your body as an integrated whole.
* Osteopathic physicians focus on preventive healthcare.
* DO's receive extra training in the musculoskeletal system - your body's interconnected system of nerves, muscles and bones that make up two-thirds of its body mass. This training provides osteopathic physicians with a better understanding of the ways that an injury or illness in one part of your body can affect another. It gives DO's a therapeutic and diagnostic advantage over those who do not receive additional specialized training.
* Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is incorporated in the training and practice of osteopathic physicians. OMT allows physicians to use their hands to diagnose injury and illness and to encourage your body's natural tendency toward good health. By combining all other medical procedures with OMT, DO's offer their patients the most comprehensive care available in medicine today.
Of course, these are only my pathetic ramblings. What are your thoughts?
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
12:30 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, politics, technology
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Tech is tech - what happened to QuickVerse?
I previously wrote a post (in Empoprise-BI) on how a wide variety of people are moving their domain registrations away from GoDaddy. My post was partly sourced from a Wired post entitled "Christians Bailing on GoDaddy Due to 'Immoral' Advertising." I shared the Wired post on FriendFeed, and a spirited conversation broke out. Several excellent points were brought out in that conversation, but I want to focus on a comment from Joey Gibson:
What's funny is that Bob Parsons was the guy from Parsons Technology that sold QuickVerse, one of the original electronic Bible programs.
I knew that, but had forgotten about it. See my 2005 Ontario Empoblog post, which quoted from a 2005 Bob Parsons post which included the following:
There's one more issue I want to address head on.
As many people know, the first company I started and sold to Intuit was called Parsons Technology. We had a number of product divisions at Parsons Technology. Our product divisions follow:
1. Financial (this included accounting, money management, and tax preparation products).
2. Legal (document preparation for home and small business).
3. Personal productivity (greeting card makers, address books, etc.)
4. Utilities (virus detection and removal, etc.)
5. Church Software (Bible lookup software, Map software, Sermon preparation, Congregational accounting).
It's true. I used to sell Bible software.
He then included a personal statement of belief.
To this day I consider myself a Christian, but I am not a fundamentalist Christian. I am also not a member of the religious right. I am not opposed in anyway to these groups. I am just not part of them. My beliefs today are exactly what they were back when I owned Parsons Technology. I'm still the same guy.
Parsons then talked more about the church software itself.
Our church software division was the brainchild of a man named Craig Rairdin. Craig, on his own, wrote the first QuickVerse program, and did it before joining Parsons Technology. When Craig showed me the program that he had written, I knew instantly that it was well done and would be a hit. Within a few weeks, Craig was our Director of Church Software, and QuickVerse was a Parsons Technology product.
Being a hard worker, Craig soon began hiring additional staff and developing additional Christian products. While Parsons Technology marketed QuickVerse, Craig owned the rights to the product, and after I sold Parsons Technology to Intuit, Craig later sold the rights to QuickVerse to another company.
Today, Craig Rairdin owns his own company. He specializes in Bible lookup and Christian software for hand held computers. His company is called Laridian Electronic Publishing and can be found at http://www.Laridian.com
And QuickVerse has its own QuickVerse.com website, and is apparently now owned by FindEx.com, Inc., which is publicly traded.
I don't believe they ran a Super Bowl ad.
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
7:00 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, religion, technology
Monday, February 2, 2009
If this "Dr. Dobb's" thingie takes off, maybe it can become its own Journal!
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
4:12 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, print, technology
Sunday, February 1, 2009
All of my Super Bowl 2009 tweets
Followup to my post on Empoprise-BI.
Here's a quick screen dump of my most recent tweets from my @oemperor Twitter account, in LIFO order.
too bad jack in the box missed the end of the game. #sb43 #superbowlads
18 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
pittsburgh wins 6th super bowl. excellent game to final seconds. 20 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
fumble? we'll see. 22 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
i've shushed 2 family members away in last minute. 26 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
ari has 35 sec and 2 time outs to score td. 27 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
review. play stands. pit needs extra point. 27 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
and now i'm seeing hardly any tweets. traffic 29 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
td td td td td ... well, they'll review. 30 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
actually on 7. i stand corrected. inc helped. 31 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
mouth open again. steelers on 5. 33 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
al michaels: it's windy. 34 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads godaddy enhanced. at least it mentioned the product. 2.5 stars. 36 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
my twitterfeed seems slow. fitzgerald overwhelmed twitter. 38 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
RT @CathleenRitt: Gordon Lightfoot just rescinded his new single "The Wreck of the Larry Fitzgerald" 39 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
@shey i may be wrong on this game. 41 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
uh...my mouth was literally wide open. ari now leading on fitzgerald run. 42 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
according to al michaels, last safety was in super bowl 25. i mean xxv. 44 minutes ago from m.slandr.net
safety. 20-16. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
@jack @ev @biz i've only had one brief access problem throughout the entire game. congrats to twitter. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
whoops, that was a retweet of an @anamariecox tweet. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
@anamariecox: ...Looking forward to FedEx's "maaakin' coopieeees" spot. #sb43ads about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads alec baldwin hulu good sense of humor. 4 stars. maybe i won't visit youtube. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads thank you ge for supporting your network. (the rainbow connection.) 2 stars. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads i'm watching on 13" tv. it's not a vizio. 1 star. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads question - if you don't know who mean joe greene is, what do you think of the coke zero commercial? about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads coke zero takeoff on mean joe greene appreciated by this geezer who remembers original. 3 stars. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
some of you may not remember, but jack in the box was was blown up in late 1970s. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
@biggjon in los angeles, jack in the box was a local sponsor. the chain is not national. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
just realized that jack in the box was not national #superbowlads - it has the most compelling story so far. must check website. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads before jack got hit by a bus, i was giving infiniti 2 stars. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads i haven't - oh my god they killed jack (again)! 4 stars. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads nfl ok. 2 stars. about 1 hour ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads sugar fr- i mean frosted flakes as health food defies reality. 1 star. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads coke ad seemed like pixar rip off. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads to careerbuilder.com - hey dummy, boring commercial. 1 star. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@venson pit couldn't score td, kicked fg again. 20-7. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
arizona's defense may have saved 4 pts. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@venson 17 pit 7 ari, penalty against ari on successful pit fg kick, pit may get 7 instead of 3. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@MiaD my problem is that i compare all #superbowlads against apple 1984. none measure up. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads witch mtn as action movie w the rock, who has already proven himself in kid's movie. 4 stars. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads the budweiser clydesdales have jumped the shark. 1 star. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads coke would like to teach the world to animate in perfect harmony. 1 star. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads i liked monster.com deer body 3 stars. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads bridgestone jump around ok. 2 stars. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@Tad next year a savvy #superbowl advertiser will say "please RT this tinyurl" about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads our local commercial in el-lay was for local furniture chain living spaces. 2 stars. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
RT @jdickerson: The chills I got from the Boss's performance were the kind associated with awkward rehersal dinner toasts. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
oooh, rebellion. plugging a disney property on an nbc universal tv show. that's...um...bad. #sb43 about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads lmao clinic gets one star for the acronym. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@BradHoward you are correct sir. they are deathly afraid of exposed nipples. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
oh dear. dialogue, referee actor about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
post janet/justin #superbowl halftime shows remind me of when i saw jan & dean in early 1980s. mostly nostalgically unsatisfying. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
just got back from fftogo - i was checking friendfeed comments on my slandr tweets. about 2 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads i don't have 3d glasses. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#sb43 17-7 pittsburgh at half, but they don't control game. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#sb43 ruling on field stands. touchdown. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
booth review??????? about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads cheetos got a LOL out of me. 4 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads teleflora good, establishes halfway believable need (flowers w/o boxes). 3 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
RT @vanhoosear: Yeah, I also noticed no American car companies mentioned in the Hyundai ad. Very smart. #superbowlads about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads pixar looks good. 4 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads hulu.com got the website name out. 4 stars. (but i'll probably go to youtube anyway.) about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads hyundai going for it. claim better than everyone. 4 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#cardinals you're supposed to go forward #sb43 about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@badbanana and the show claims the existence of a "hyundai" car and "bud light" beer. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
RT @nathanchase: did you see that home run? what a shot! can't wait for the 10th frame about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@4fthawaiian madden has not flown in decades. he used amtrak, then a custom bus to go to games. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads cars.com got my attention. 4 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads so what IS mission g? 2 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#cardinals good play #sb43 - this is a game. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
RT @anamariecox: Said it before, will Tweet it again: New Trek movie="Muppet Babies." about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@DaveMurr animals, FOREIGN cars, and movie trailers. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads star trek - i watched it twice, but the characters were nearly invisible. 1.5 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads bud horse love yawn. 2 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@Jesse why so low on pedigree #superbowlads ? about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads pedigree adoption drive conveyed message well. 4 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads godaddy now predictable, but leading people to product good move. 3 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads loud doritos fun. 3 stars. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads will ferrell 2 stars. "matt lauer can eat it" was good. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@CatchUpLady as i watched bridgestone #superbowlads i thought men would like it better. about 3 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads castrol, kept on looking at monkeys. 2 stars. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#sb43 end of 1st quarter already? about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
order of magnitude on pittsburgh yards #sb43 about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@vdegeorge tell your 5 y/o daughter the story of kurt & ben and their magical pig(skin). about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
ben r has THE POISE. #sb43 about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@ariedana live-blog my twitterstream if you like. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@outtacontext i think you and i are only ones who liked conan sweden #superbowlads about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads conan bud light 4 stars. if it had been finland rather than sweden i would have given 6. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@tiffanypr re companies monitoring twitter. hopefully. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
got a 502 error, but it passed. #twittout about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@dalecruse failure to score on 4th and 1 could have been psychologically devastating. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads doritos 8 ball good, painful at end 3.5 stars. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads pepsi forever young yawn 2 stars. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads audi 4 stars. foreign car companies taking advantage. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
oops, #superbowlads bud light 2 stars. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#suprbowlads bud light, i kept on thinking: what company serves beer at all meetings? 2 stars. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@mandyg madden-bashing is a patriotic american tradition. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@rondean i go with recent experience steelers in #sb43 about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#superbowlads hyundai again. corgan's voice wasn't too whiny. 3 stars. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
curious if matt leinert has been interviewed #sb43 about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@vanhoosear did i see that the nfl itself will air one of the #superbowlads in 3rd quarter? about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
well, hyundai can afford to advertise in pregame #superbowlads about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
#sb43 derived question - do singers sing soulful versions of "o canada" or "god save the queen"? about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
yes, world, #sb43 is a religious event. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
so are we doing america the beautiful and the national anthem before #sb43 ? (searches for lee greenwood) about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
hopefully getting payton award before #sb43 kickoff won't mess up kurt warner. about 4 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@Williamblake paris hilton has a british best friend show too? wonder how the american best friend feels. about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@agersh i believe sporting events such as #superbowl get highest viewership as an evening program (east coast time). about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@stevehall i'm a creature of habit. i tweeted to @superbowlads acct last year, so i like the similarly named #hashtag about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
haven't decided on other #hashtag - i like #sb43 and it's short, but everyone is using #superbowl instead. i may do #sb43 anyway. about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
my #hashtags for today? #superbowlads rather than #sb43ads and #superads09 about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
RT @mattearley: I propose that the hashtag for Super Bowl 43 should be #SB43 . If you agree, please retweet. about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@vanhoosear 2008 #superbowlads were rated on a 1 to 5 star scale. about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@vanhoosear i think there was a rating system for last year's #superbowlads (tweets to @superbowlads acct). have to dig it up. about 7 hours ago from m.slandr.net
@mvavrinak thx for tweeting about @spotcritic - hadn't heard about it. about 8 hours ago from m.slandr.net
And here are my replies from that period:
dcfemella @oemperor Shush! 9 minutes ago from FriendFeed in reply to oemperor
davidsinger @oemperor seems to have clobbered their server about 1 hour ago from Twinkle
MiaD @oemperor LOL! I m sure it's been all downhill since :) about 2 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to oemperor
goblinbox @oemperor LOL about 2 hours ago from TwitterFon in reply to oemperor
dcfemella @oemperor I said the same thing! Super cute about 3 hours ago from FriendFeed in reply to oemperor
mvavrinak @oemperor @vanhoosear smart and also pointed... few American brands are actually true luxury worldwide about 3 hours ago from web in reply to oemperor
DaveMurr @oemperor good point about 3 hours ago from twhirl
vdegeorge @oemperor I tried to get her to watch, but she's not interested because neither team is wearing pink. Sigh. about 4 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to oemperor
outtacontext @oemperor No, I saw other tweets who agreed. about 4 hours ago from TwitterFon in reply to oemperor
mandyg @oemperor LOL ...I think my own personal hell would be having to listen to Madden and Lou Holtz about 4 hours ago from web in reply to oemperor
vanhoosear @oemperor Heh. Do they have to pay for their own spots? about 4 hours ago from twhirl
RanchoVibe @oemperor - from one Canadian here - the answer is yes. about 4 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to oemperor
ScotMcKay @oemperor Should energize him, I'd say. about 4 hours ago from Twittelator in reply to oemperor
agersh @oemperor makes sense that #superbowl gets highest viewership as an evening program actually. about 5 hours ago from web
Williamblake @oemperor You can imaging now!!! ;) about 7 hours ago from web in reply to oemperor
stevehall @oemperor #hashtags for today? #superads09 and #sb43ads rather than #superbowlads :) about 7 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to oemperor
mvavrinak @oemperor welcome!! Hope to see you as part of the stream! about 8 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to oemperor
Now I just have to write up a history of Jack in the Box. A number of the commercials in the Super Bowl relied on historical precedent, and Jack was one of them. [8:20 PM - I'VE WRITTEN THE HISTORY, WHICH IS AT EMPOPRISE-BI.]
Oh, and I need to check that SocialToo survey. My 4 star commercials were the following:
- Audi
- Conan Bud Light (Sweden)
- Pedigree adoption drive
- cars.com
- Hyundai ad that trumpeted how Hyundai was better than other car manufacturers
- Earlier Hulu spot
- Pixar movie
- Cheetos with the bird
- Witch Mountain movie
- Jack from Jack in the Box being hit by a bus
- Alec Baldwin's Hulu spot
So my highest rated ads were Diet Pepsi Max (What is Love), Budweiser (wine & cheese), FedEx (giant pigeons), Tide (the talking stain), the GMC Yukon (Sisyphus), and Coke (parade). Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
7:55 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, sports, technology, television
Saturday, January 31, 2009
An update on the now FOUR-blog Empoprises blog empire
Perhaps some of the readers of this blog may know about my side project, Empoprises. In essence, while this blog, mrontemp, is "all-encompassing," the Empoprises blogs are much more vertically-oriented, and only deal with one topic per blog.
In fact, the first two "Empoprises" blogs that I started are VERY vertically-oriented:
- Empoprise-IE, started in May 2008, is devoted to the Inland Empire of California.
- Empoprise-NTN, also started in May 2008, is devoted to the NTN Buzztime trivia game that you find in various bars and restaurants.
But then I began thinking about my own personal interests, and began to branch out a bit.
The third Empoprises blog that I started was Empoprise-MU, devoted to music. That blog had a soft introduction on August 6, 2008, and started posting real music stories the next day. Those who have read mrontemp know that I've posted a lot of music items on this blog - over 400, as a matter of fact - so I figured that I've have something to say about music. Plus, if I may say so myself, as the founder of the lastfmfeeds room on FriendFeed (currently with 108 members viewing 50 "recently played tracks" feeds), I've certainly demonstrated my interest in the topic.
But if I've posted over 400 music items in mrontemp, it should also be noted that I've posted over 1200 business items on this blog. And as I found myself writing more and more about subjects such as what Apple should and should not disclose about Steve Jobs' health (sample post here), I began thinking that it was the appropriate time to add a business blog to the Empoprises empire. Again, this blog had a soft launch on Thursday, January 29, with real posts beginning on Friday, January 30.
So, what happens to mrontemp if I start putting all the business and music stuff elsewhere? I can only share my thoughts as of today, and you need to bear in mind that they could very well change tomorrow. (If you had asked me last April whether I would ever start a business or music blog, the answer would have been an emphatic "no.") So, here's my thinking:
- There will still be business and music posts in mrontemp, as well as some Inland Empire and NTN Buzztime posts also. Obviously there won't be as many, but they'll be there, though the ones that end up here will probably be more personal, such as the wrap-up of the story about my Oracle OpenWorld Unconference presentation.
- Incidentally, it's very possible that the Empoprise-BI blog may be my main posting ground for Oracle OpenWorld 2009, assuming that I actually go to Oracle OpenWorld 2009. Over the years I've shifted my Oracle OpenWorld posts from blog to blog - for example, my first Oracle OpenWorld posts were in an old blog called the Ontario Technoblog.
- Which brings me to my next point - if you were to ask me today whether I'll be starting an Empoprises technology blog, my answer would be an emphatic "no." Frankly, there are a ton of tech blogs out there and, other than user experiences, my best contributions to technological blogging are on the business end of things.
- Let's talk monetization. As you can see, all of the Empoprises blogs contain ads, while the mrontemp blog does not. Presently I plan to keep it that way, since an "all-encompassing" blog doesn't really lend itself to targeted ads. Incidentally, that's also why I haven't started an Empoprises religion blog, despite my clear interest in the topic. At present I feel a little funny making money off of God. Not that I quibble with religious bloggers who do carry advertisements, and it's possible that I may change my mind someday, but not now. (And in case you're wondering, yes I used to have a religion blog also.)
- So will mrontemp (and, for that matter, the "Ontario Emperor" name) become a mere personal blog/face to the world, with Empoprises becoming less personal? Yes and no. Frankly, I have more fun when I write Empoprises posts from a personal perspective. For better or worse, the Empoprises blogs will focus on my thoughts about business, music, and the like.
http://feedproxy.google.com/Empoprise-ie (Empoprise-IE, Inland Empire)
http://feedproxy.google.com/Empoprise-mu (Empoprise-MU, music)
http://feedproxy.google.com/Empoprise-ntn (Empoprise-NTN, NTN Buzztime)
I look forward to your subscriptions, your visits, and your comments. Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
2:20 PM
View Comments
Friday, January 30, 2009
No, I won't be "securing the Tampa Convention Center"
This is a semi-amusing little postscript to a story that started several months ago. In fact, it began precisely on Friday, August 22, 2008.
That morning I was sitting in a presentation at a conference in Louisville, Kentucky, performing some free association on a notepad. Specifically, I was thinking about presentations that our company could give at the 2009 conference.
But then I began thinking about a presentation that I could give at the Oracle OpenWorld 2008 Unconference. The idea was that I could give the presentation at Oracle OpenWorld, then adapt it for presentation in 2009. (I'm green, so I believe that recycling presentations is good.)
As readers of this blog know, I eventually came up with a presentation idea for the Oracle OpenWorld 2008 unconference. After that I worked on the associated last.fm playlist, found Overlook 3A, went to the overlook, and gave my presentation.
That was 2008. This is 2009...and it's time to figure out how to revamp this presentation for an entirely different audience. As far as I'm concerned, there are two differences between the Oracle OpenWorld Unconference audience and the other audience:
- The other audience is much more knowledgeable about automated fingerprint identification systems and biometrics. While there are people at Oracle OpenWorld who are knowledgeable about these topics, the vast majority of OpenWorld attendees have other interests. Therefore, my OpenWorld presentation included some basic information about AFIS which the average attendee at the other conference wouldn't need.
- The organization hosting the other conference has some specific rules about presentations that are not found at the Oracle OpenWorld Unconference. The 2009 conference is dedicated to exploring the scientific disciplines that are followed by the practitioners who attend this conference. Therefore, it is acceptable to talk about ideas in general, but it is not acceptable to promote a particular vendor. If I were to go to the conference and exclusively talk about my product and the Oracle database, one of the conference executives would literally stand up and stop my presentation.
- Biometric systems that are designed to be used for a particular event.
- Biometric systems that are designed to be used at a particular location (or to secure a particular perimeter).
- Biometric systems that are designed for both purposes.
For the 2009 presentation (which would be held in Tampa), I would concentrate on real-life examples, such as biometric systems designed for jail entry/exit, systems designed for an election, and other types of systems. Whether the "perimeter" to be protected was the perimeter of a jail, the perimeter of a school lunchroom, or the perimeter of a country (e.g. a biometric-enabled visa/passport), I wanted to explore the commonality between different types of "event-based" and "perimeter-based" systems.
You see, biometric systems are already classified in some traditional ways, the most common of which is to divide them between criminal, civil, and commercial applications. But I was wondering whether, for example, "event-based" systems would have some commonalities regardless of whether or not the system was criminal, civil, or commercial. For example, would a system designed to investigate a crime be similar in any way to a system designed for the World Cup?
So I wrote a title and a synopsis, although I had difficulty with the title. Ordinarily I would have used the word "classification" in the title, but it turns out that classification has a particular meaning in the biometric world, so I had to find an alternate word that wouldn't mislead my audience. I played around with "taxonomy" (which explains my January 21 reading) but eventually decided that I needed a better word.
But before I found a better word, I read the synopsis of my proposed presentation. After reading the synopsis, I asked myself the following question:
I was forced to conclude that my presentation idea, as then conceived, didn't really benefit the attendees of the Tampa conference. I still think it's a good idea, and may pursue it someday, but with a different audience.
At this point I'm not sure what the takeaway from this is, other than to note that an idea, once conceived, may mutate into something entirely different from what you originally envisioned. Take the church choir singer who didn't realize that the solution to his problem would also solve my later problem about idea brainstorming. Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Ontario Emperor
at
12:45 PM
View Comments
Labels: business, education, openworld08, technology



