Friday, April 25, 2008

Why we already know everything, here in 2008

I was born in 1961, and the only decade that freaked me out was the decade that followed my birth. In my childlike mind, I was convinced that the world was going to change in 1970, and that all sorts of strange, new things were going to happen. While the 1970s were a strange and wonderful decade, it wasn't a clean break with everything that came before.

But, as Caveat Bettor notes, people in 1970 were convinced that the world of the year 2000 WOULD be very different. Caveat Bettor linked to Mark Perry, who linked to an April 22, 2008 press release from the Washington Policy Center.

April 22, 2008

Contact: John Barnes

Earth Day 2008: Predictions of Environmental Disaster Were Wrong

“By 1985...air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight
reaching the earth by one half” – Life magazine, January 1970

Seattle – Another Earth Day is upon us. This is a good time to look back at predictions made on the original Earth Day about environmental disasters that were about to hit the planet.

Most Earth Day predictions turned out to be stunningly wrong. In 1970, environmentalists said there would soon be a new ice age and massive deaths from air pollution. The New York Times foresaw the extinction of the human race. Widely-quoted biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted worldwide starvation by 1975. Documented examples are below.

On this Earth Day 2008, new predictions will again be made about looming environmental disasters about to strike our planet. If past experience is any guide, most of these predictions are wrong. People concerned about our planet’s future should be wary of statements from activists and other interested groups, so we stay focused on real environmental concerns, and don’t waste time on fearsome predictions that will never happen.

• “...civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind,” biologist George Wald, Harvard University, April 19, 1970.

• By 1995, “...somewhere between 75 and 85 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.” Sen. Gaylord Nelson, quoting Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, Look magazine, April 1970.

• Because of increased dust, cloud cover and water vapor “...the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born,” Newsweek magazine, January 26, 1970.

Note: the global cooling theories that were prevalent at this time are laid out in this 1974 TIME Magazine article.

• The world will be “...eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age,” Kenneth Watt, speaking at Swarthmore University, April 19, 1970.

• “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation,” biologist Barry Commoner, University of Washington, writing in the journal Environment, April 1970.

• “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from the intolerable deteriorations and possible extinction,” The New York Times editorial, April 20, 1970.

• “By 1985, air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half...” Life magazine, January 1970.

• “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich, interview in Mademoiselle magazine, April 1970.

• “...air certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone,” Paul Ehrlich, interview in Mademoiselle magazine, April 1970.

• Ehrlich also predicted that in 1973, 200,000 Americans would die from air pollution, and that by 1980 the life expectancy of Americans would be 42 years.

• “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” Earth Day organizer Denis Hayes, The Living Wilderness, Spring 1970.

• “By the year 2000...the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America and Australia, will be in famine,” Peter Gunter, North Texas State University, The Living Wilderness, Spring 1970.

Our purpose on Earth Day 2008 is not simply to point out how often environmental activists have been wrong, but to learn from the mistakes made during past Earth Days. Learning from the past will give us a better understanding of our world and the threats that face it.

By being skeptical about routine portents of doom, we can stay focused on the real threats that face our planet, and on the reasonable and achievable actions we as a society can take to meet them.

Of course, some feel that the best thing to do about the Washington Policy Center is to marginalize it:

Michael Ennis at the right-wing millionaire funded Washington Policy Center takes exception to my post about his group’s attempts in Clark County to scuttle light rail....

Facts are funny things, actually. I mean, Ennis was at this forum on Apr. 10, agitating in our community, when a director of the Columbia River Crossing project put forth a different [cost] figure....

But what’s a quarter billion dollar difference when it helps you make your right-wing millionaire funded point? All that Coors (or whatever) money has to be used for something I suppose....

So the Washington Policy Center prefers bus rapid transit. Great. They should make the case for it instead of publishing anti-light rail screeds in our local newspaper....

I vigorously objected to Ennis’s “local opinion” piece in The Columbian in the first place. It was a one-sided assault on one particular aspect of the project made by someone who doesn’t even live here.

Plus I just enjoy attacking right-wing stink tanks. It’s fun, if not profitable.

These propaganda shops don’t speak for anyone except their ideological backers. If stating that obvious fact constitutes an ad hominem attack against them, so be it. Progressives have allowed the far right to define the debate too many times on too many issues, and the right wing tactic is always the same: distort and obfuscate the real issues using their funhouse institutions, paid for with the largess of wealthy right-wing extremists. They have that First Amendment right, of course, and we have the same right to call them on their baloney.

The Washington Policy Center is trying to kill light rail in Clark County because, like the Borg, that’s what they do.

Throw in a mention of Skull & Bones and it would be perfect.

Sphere: Related Content
blog comments powered by Disqus